world best Arabic site. Wherever you may be, and whatever you find yourself doing—walking, driving, flying, cooking—steal a moment and listen to the new Library of Arabic Literature podcasts, which feature conversations with our LAL Fellows as they discuss their upcoming projects.

Subscribe Us

Breaking

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot

Monday, September 14, 2015

Teaching of Arabic: A Comparative Analysis of Universities in India and The United Arab Emirates

Research Proposal for Provisional Registration to PhD Program

On

Teaching of Arabic: A Comparative Analysis of Universities in India and
The United Arab Emirates


Submitted by:
ABDUL KHader.pk



Under the Supervision of
Prof. Abdul Rasak T (HoD of Arabic)
Dr. Remith George Carri (Dep. of Edn. (Co. Supervisor))




Department of Arabic Language and Literature
Assam University,                    
                                                       Silchar                                                                     Assam, India
Teaching of Arabic: A Comparative Analysis of Universities in India and the United Arab Emirates
Abstract
Arabic is one of the Semitic languages originated in the Middle East. The history of classical Arabic dates from the 5th century A.D. As a language, Arabic has a multiple dimensions. At the same time, it is a modern live language spoken by over150 millions people as mother tongue. The United Arab Emirates is a union of seven emirates formed in the year 1971. It is one of the prominent nations in the Middle-East where Arabic is the mother tongue.

Standard literary Arabic is the same all over the world and across the periods. The popularly used colloquial versions of Arabic differ from place to place and country to country. Often this difference is such that the different forms of spoken Arabic are not mutually intelligible.   

In the United Arab Emirates, Arabic is taught in almost all the universities both to the native and non-native students. In many of these universities, there are the institutes of the centers exclusively for non-native speakers. Because of the aforementioned prevalence of colloquial Arabic, even the native learners of Arabic of the universities in the  United Arab Emirates are not in an advantageous position vis-à-vis Arabic learning is concerned. However, thanks to the affluence and concerned with their higher education in the present days most modern teaching methods are used in these universities. The learners in the centers for non-native speakers in these universities are of the different nationalities having different linguistic backgrounds.

Thanks to its historical relationship with the Arab world resulted with the trade relation and expansion of Islam, Arabic has been popular in India since centuries. Because of the religious aspect of the Arabic Language, millions of Indians have association with Arabic at varies levels and extents. Arabic is taught in India at around 50 universities at under graduate and post graduate level. It is true that teaching Arabic as second language in Indian context poses many challenges: Arabic sound system is different from that of the Indian languages; the students of Arabic do not have an Arabic environment as English students have to an English environment. Though, Arabic as a language has different identities, its religious identity overpowers other identities at all levels including higher education, owing to the prejudicial activities of the people.

In Indian universities Arabic learners, in contrast to the western and Far-Eastern universities Arabic learners mostly hail from a particular religious view- the Muslims (barring a few exception in the metros like Delhi and a the states like Kerala). Most of these learners thanks to their use of their Arabic for religious purpose have a grip over this language on limited extend.  The Arabic learners in Indian universities can approximately be divided in to three mother tongue groups: Urdu, Malayalam, and Bengali/Assamese (Bengali and Assamese are deliberately put together as the learners of a foreign language of this mother tongue groups face mostly the same problems as far as foreign language learning is concerned). Learners from this different mother tongue group face problems different from one another as far as acquisition of Arabic language is concerned.

As mentioned earlier, Arabic is also modern living language. But teaching methodologies of teaching a second language have not been resorted in teaching in India. The indifference of the Arab government in promoting Arabic language outside the Arab world also hampers the development of learning Arabic in India. However there is increased skill acquisition in new generation learner sector in Arabic in India. This is owing to the increased migration to the Middle East and the expansion of the communication technologies.

Although some of the books and researches which are done in this field those mentionable are, Mashakilu Taaleemillugathi Arabiyya fil Hind by Pro. Shafeeq Ahmad Khan Nadwi and Teaching of Arabic Language by Shipra Publications, New Delhi. Also, the research works, which ever conducted, in this field are rarely result making for the above mentioned topic. No significant account of work is done on the teaching methods of Arabic language in Indian and the United Arab Emirates institutions. This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap by taking out some methods being applied in the both geographical areas, their teaching strategies and the extent to which they have benefited the education in general and Arabic language and literature in particular.

This study promotes a comparative analysis on Teaching Techniques of Arabic Language between Arabic departments in Indian and the United Arab Emirates universities. The awareness of students-faculty involvements in the making of an effective academic scenario in the institutions along with indications to merits and demerits of their application are another point of concern in the paper.

Researcher has already been facilitated for conducting online conferences with Heads and students of Arabic departments in some Indian and United Arab Emirates Universities for the purposes of data collection and its analysis. The samples will be taken from Some Indian universities such as Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi; English and Foreign Language University, Hyderabad; University of Calicut, Calicut, Kerala; Assam University, Silchar and the United Arab Emirates universities such as Zayid University, Dubai; Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi and etc.

This research will be This research will be tentatively chapterised into five chapters viz, Chapter 1: Introduction and Conceptual Framework, which will introduce the Arabic Teaching, its significance, its teaching for native and non-native learners; need and significance of study, justification of the study, title of the study, objectives, hypothesis, operational definition of ‘teaching of Arabic’ and the delimitation of the study; Chapter 2: Review of related literature which will include the books and researches related to this study; Chapter 3: Methodology which will include design of the study, survey; population and sample, developed tools, data collection and data analysis;  Chapter 4: Analysis of the data which will include the finding, summary, conclusion and suggestions









Teaching Methods of Arabic: A Comparative Analysis of Universities in India and the United Arab Emirates

Statement of the Problem:
Arabic is one of the Semitic languages originated in the Middle-East. The history of classical Arabic dates from the 5th century A.D. As a language Arabic has multiple dimensions; it is the language of Holy Quran and the great classical poets and writers such as Imrul Qais, Al Mutunabbi, Ibnu Khaldun and others. At the same time it is a modern live language spoken by over150 millions people as a mother tongue. It is also the religious language of the Muslims all over the world. They are required to be conversant with it to some extent.

The United Arab Emirates is a union of seven emirates formed in the year 1971. It is the one of the prominent nations in the Middle-East where Arabic is the mother tongue.

Standard literary Arabic is the same all over the world and across the periods. It has been standardized irrespective of times and climes, thanks to the Holy Quran. This means that the literary Arabic of the 6th century and that of the 21st century are mutually intelligible.  Despite this colloquial Arabic is so popular in the Arab world that even the educated Arabs of the contemporary period need not necessarily be conversant with the standard Arabic.  And this colloquial Arabic differs from country to country. Often this difference is such that the different forms of spoken Arabic are not mutually intelligible.

In the United Arab Emirates, Arabic is taught in almost all the universities both to the native and non native learners in many of these universities, there are institutes and centers exclusively for non native speakers. Because of the aforementioned prevalence of colloquial Arabic, even the native learners of Arabic of the universities in the  United Arab Emirates are not in an advantageous position vis-à-vis Arabic learning is concerned. However, thanks to the affluence and concern with higher education in the present days, most modern teaching methods are used in these universities. The learners in the centers for non native speakers in these universities are of the different nationalities having different linguistic backgrounds.

Thanks to its historical relationship with the Arab world resulted with the trade relation and expansion of Islam, Arabic has been popular in India since centuries. Because of the religious aspect of the Arabic Language, millions of Indians have association with Arabic at varying levels and extents.

Arabic is taught in India at around 50 universities at under graduate and / or post graduate levels. It is true that teaching Arabic as second language in Indian context poses many challenges: Arabic sound system is different from that of the Indian languages; the students of Arabic do not have an Arabic environment as English students have to an English environment. Though, Arabic as a language has different identities in India, its religious identity overpowers all other identities at all levels including higher education, owing to the prejudicial attitudes of the people.

In Indian universities Arabic Learners, in contrast to the western and some Far-Eastern universities Arabic learners mostly hail from a particular religious background- the Muslims, barring a few exception in the metros like Delhi and the states like Kerala. Most of these learners, thanks to their use of Arabic for religious purpose, have a grip over this language to a limited extent.  The Arabic learners in Indian universities can approximately be divided in to three mother tongue groups: Urdu, Malayalam, and Bengali/Assamese (Bengali and Assamese are put together, as the learners from either this mother tongue groups face mostly the same problems as far as foreign language learning is concerned). Learners from these different mother tongue groups face problems different from one another as far as acquisition of Arabic language is concerned.

As mentioned earlier, Arabic is also a modern living language. But teaching methodologies of teaching a second language have not been resorted to in teaching Arabic in India. The indifference of the Arab government in promoting Arabic language outside the Arab world also hampers the development of learning Arabic in India. However there is increased skill acquisition in new generation learners of Arabic in India. This is owing to the increased migration of Indians to the Middle-East and the expansion of the communication technologies.

Survey of Literature:
The earlier literary sources which discuss the basic theories of Arabic Teaching Methods are rarely available. However some studies are conducted in this field.  Worth mentioning among them are, Mashakil al Ta’leem al Luga al Arabiyya fil Hind by Pro. Shafeeq Ahmad Khan Nadwi and Teaching of Arabic Language by Shipra Publications, New Delhi. Also, the research works, which ever conducted, in this field are rarely result making for the above mentioned topic.

No significant account of work is done comparing the teaching methods of Arabic language in Indian universities and universities in the Arab world. This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap by comparing out some methods being applied in the both geographical areas, their teaching strategies and the extent to which they have benefited the education in general and Arabic language and literature in particular.

Objectives:
Teaching aids and techniques are one of the most vibrant topics in the present academic sphere. Teaching methodologies of Arabic language and its teaching techniques need to be developed further more though only a few researches have been conducted in this field. This study aims to make a comparative analysis on teaching techniques of Arabic language between Arabic departments in Indian universities and the United Arab Emirates universities. The awareness of students-faculty involvements in the making of an effective academic scenario in the institutions along with indications to merits and demerits of their application are another point of concern in the paper. The objectives of this study are:
1.      To study the status of teaching Arabic as a native language.
2.      To study the status of teaching Arabic as a non native language.
3.      To compare teaching of Arabic in the universities of India and United Arab Emirates.
4.      To study the teaching of Arabic of two of the purely private Indian higher educational institution viz. Darul Huda Islamic University, Kerala and Co-Ordination of Islamic Colleges, Valanchery, Kerala.


Hypothesis:
Ø  Innovative teaching techniques of Arabic language in the United Arab Emirates universities have caused much for the progress of its status by attracting diverse students including foreigners. 
Ø  Some of the United Arab Emirates Universities have turned out as role models in application of teaching techniques and have been imitated by Arabic departments of some Indian Universities.
Ø  The teaching procedures of Arabic language in some universities are far better than its teaching even in the United Arab Emirates universities.

Data and Methodology:
The methodology of data collection, which has wide scope of availability for this work, is collecting sample data. This research is held upon some samples taken from both Indian and United Arab Emirates universities.
Researcher has already been facilitated for conducting online conferences with Heads and students of Arabic departments in some Indian and United Arab Emirates Universities for the purposes of data collection and its analysis. The samples will be taken from Some Indian universities such as Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi; English and Foreign Language University, Hyderabad; University of Calicut, Calicut, Kerala; Assam University, Silchar and the United Arab Emirates universities such as Zayid University, Dubai; Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi etc. To make a better comparison, data will be collected from one of the purely private higher educational institution viz. Darul Huda Islamic University, Kerala.

Organization:
This research will be tentatively chapterised into five chapters:
Chapter 1: Introduction and Conceptual Framework
It will introduce the Arabic Teaching, its significance, its teaching for native and non native learners; need and significance of study, justification of the study, title of the study, objectives, hypothesis, operational definition of ‘teaching of Arabic’ and the delimitation of the study.
Chapter 2: Review of related literature
It will include the books and researches related to this study.
Chapter 3: Methodology
It will include design of the study, survey; population and sample, developed tools, data collection and data analysis.
Chapter 4: Analysis of the data
            It will include the finding, summary, conclusion and suggestions


Bibliography

1.      Abboud, P. F. (1979). The Verb in Northern Najdi Arabic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 42 (3): 467-499. University of London.
2.      ACTFL Preliminary Guidelines. (2001). A Revised Ed., ACTFL, Inc.
3.      Al Batal, M. (1993). Issues in Teaching the Productive Skills in Arabic. In Al Batal, M. (Ed.). The Teaching of Arabic as a Foreign Language: Issues and Directions. Al- ‘Arabiyya Monograph Series # 2: 115-130.
4.      Allen, R (1985). Arabic Proficiency Guidelines. Al-‘Arabiyya. Journal of the American Association of Teachers of Arabic 18 (1&2): 45-70.
5.      Allen, R. (1989). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Foreign Language Annals 22: 373-391.
6.      Allen, R. (2003). Expanding Writing’s Role in Learning: Teacher Training Holds Key to Change. Curriculum Update, Association Supervision & Curriculum Development: 1-8
Issues 23: 8-28.
7.      1. Abdul, Razak (2001). Online delivery systems: Setting baseline for professional development of educators. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 1 (20, 47-
8.      52. 2. Alam, Shoiab. “Teaching of Arabic Language”. Shipra Publications, New Delhi-110002 3. Al Nabi, Mohammad Hasan (2013). Poor Arabic Language Curriculum,
9.      (1989). Arabi adab Ki Tareekh, NCPUL, New Delhi. 6. Rahman, S.A. “Arabic in India: Retrospects and Prospects”, Muslim and Arab Perspectives”. International Islamic
10.  ACTIVote component of interactive Whiteboard technology. System, 35 (2007), 119-133. 8 Sirkema, S., Implementing Information Technologies in the learning process,
11.  A personal interview with  A.I. Rahmatullah, the former HoD, Arabic Department, Calicut University, Kerala, India
12.  A personal interview with the HoD, Arabic Department, Abudhabi University, Abudhabi, UAE
13.  A personal interview with Anfal Muhammed, Assistant Professor, English Department, MES College, Kalladi, Kerala
14.  A personal interview with Prof. Abdul Rasak.T, HoD, Arabic Department, Assam University, Silchar.
15.  Badawi, E. (1971). mustawayaat al- ‘arabiyya al-mu’aasira fi misr (Levels of Contemporary Arabic in Egypt). Cairo: dar al- ma’aarif.
16.  Badawi, E. (1985). Educated Spoken Arabic: A problem in Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language. In Jankowski, K.R. (Ed). Scientific and Humanistic Dimensions of language. John Benjamin Pub. Company, pp 15-22.

17.  Bazerman, C. & Russell, D. (Eds., 1994). Landmark Essays on Writing Across the Curriculum. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press.
18.  Curtain, H. A. and Pesola, C. A. (1988). Languages and Children – Making the Match. Addison Wesley.
19.  Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency, Linguistic Interdependence, The Optimum Age Question, And Some Other Matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism 19: 197-205.
20.  De Jong, R. (2000). A Grammar of the Bedouin Dialects of the Northern Sinai Littoral: Bridging the Linguistic Gap Between Eastern and Western Arab World. Leiden: Brill.
21.  Emig, J. (1997). Writing as a Mode of Learning. College Composition and Communication 28: 122-128.
22.  Education, Fife Approaches to Race, Class and Gender, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. 10. Usun, S. (2009). Information and Communication Technologies
23.  Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15: 325-340.
24.  Gamal, A. (2001). Arabic Language Center Operation Guidelines. Dubai: Zayed University.
25.  Gamal, A. (2003). COL 130 Arabic Composition Course Syllabus. Dubai: Zayed University.
26.  Hedayet, N. (1993). ACTFL Proficiency Interview and the Problem of Code-Switching in Arabic as a Foreign Language. Conference Proceedings of the Association Internationale de LanguesLinguistique. Holland, Amsterdam.
27.  Hijazi, Mahmoud Fahmi. (1998). The Arabic Language in the Modern Age: Issues and Problems. Cairo, Qobaa Publishing House.
28.  Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Setting. Journal of Social
29.  (ICTs) in Teacher Education (ITE) program in the world and Turkey, Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 1, 2009, 3331-334.
30.  Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf perspectives Volume www.zu.ac.ae/lthe
31.  Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives Volume 1Arabic Across the Curriculum in a Bilingual Gulf University NagwaHedaiat Zayed University, Dubai Discuss this paper online at http://groups.yahoo.com/LTHE/
32.  Liskin-Gasparro, Judith E. (2003). The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines & the Oral Proficiency Interview: A Brief History & Analysis of Their Survival. Foreign Language Annals 36 No. 4: 483-489.
33.  Magazine 3 (1996):157. 7 Schmid, E.C. (2009). Enhancing performance knowledge and self-esteem in classroom language learning: The potential of the language
34.  Mashakilu Taaleemillugathi Arabiyya fil Hind by Pro. Shafeeq Ahmad Khan Nadwi
35.  Matar, A. (1981). “ Lahjato l-badwi” in Arabic (Bedouin Vernacular Arabic). Dar al- ma’aarif, Cairo.
36.  National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges. (2003). The Neglected “R”: The Need for a Writing Revolution. Retrieved Feb. 15th, 2004 from <http://www.writingcommission.org>.
37.  North, B. (1993). The Development of Descriptors on Scales of Language Proficiency. Washington, D.C.: National Foreign Language Center.
38.  Olson, D. 1977. From Utterance to Text: The Bias of Language in Speech and Writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47:257-281.
39.  Sakarna, Ahmad Khalaf. (2002). The Bedouin Dialect of Al- Zawaida Tribe, Southern Jordan. Al-’Arabiyya. Journal of the American Association of Teachers of Arabic (35): 61-86.
40.  The National Daily www.zawya.com

41.  Teaching, plague Education System. Gulf news.com, Feb, 11, 2013. 4. Kaur, Kuldip. Madrasa Education in Independent India. Rajat Publications, Jaipur. 5. Nadvi, A.H.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot

Pages